AT Device Exchange and Recycling Programs
|
Programs/Links
State Programs Other Programs Other Resources State Activities Device Loan Device ReUse Device Demo Financing Loans for AT AFP State Loans Other Loans |
AT Device ReUse
Section Links Exchange Programs Abbreviations/Key Table of State Exchange Programs Description of State Exchange Programs Featured Exchange Program Recycling Programs Abbreviations/Key Table of State Recycling Programs Description of State Recycling Programs Featured Recycling Program Credit
Equipment exchange programs match individuals who require assistive technology devices with people donating or selling used equipment that is no longer needed by publishing a list of items wanted and items for sale in an electronic or print format. The actual transaction, including payment and delivery of an item, is negotiated between the buyer and seller. Exchange programs regularly follow up with a phone call, e-mail, or mail survey to assess satisfaction or determine if an item is still for sale. An increase in availability of assistive technology and a reduction in cost of devices are essential to meeting the needs of citizens with disabilities. Findings 30 states report operating equipment exchange and/or recycling programs (Tables 3, 4, 5, and 6). 9 have an exchange program only, 11 only recycling, and 10 operate both. All projects operate statewide except in Florida, where service is currently dedicated to persons residing in the northwest part of the state. Staff associated with the state projects provide most of the services. The most popular items to exchange or recycle are computers, DME such as wheelchairs, walkers, and beds, and other forms of assistive technology devices. The programs are promoted via web sites, newsletters, brochures, presentations, and other outreach. Range of Services and Associated Fees— Exchange programs comprise a published list of items for sale or items wanted. There is minimal, if any, involvement by the project in actual negotiation or delivery of an item between the buyer and the seller. Most exchange programs do not charge fees. Programs Primarily Funded by General AT Act Dollars— Most of the exchange and recycling programs are funded by general AT Act dollars. However, some states, such as Florida, Georgia, Missouri and Pennsylvania, have designated a few thousand to tens of thousands of dollars for their projects. Kansas received a $200,000 in-kind match by the lead agency. Nebraska received $100,000 from state programs and grants. And in Utah, the state provides funding for personnel space. Quantifying Benefits by Tracking Equipment Value— A few states were able to quantify benefits of their exchange or recycling programs by tracking the value of the equipment through the program. For example, Kansas’ equipment exchange program brought back $267,000 worth of equipment in its first year. In Nebraska, TechConnectors provided 80 used computers to vocational rehabilitation clients at an estimated savings of $80,000. In Oklahoma, the cost-benefit of the exchange program last year was $163,002. A Variety of Innovative Practices— There are several innovative practices among the states. Connecticut uses a business model with its NEAT Marketplace. The Marketplace includes 25,000 square feet of computer lab, displays, accessible meeting and classroom space. Organizations, vendors and evaluators pay fees to use the services, which help sustain the operation. They are looking to make this a regional program to leverage costs among neighboring states. In Georgia, the ReBoot program operates with 85% consumer involvement. Indiana is working toward a statewide clearinghouse for all exchange programs. The Iowa project supports refurbishing by Easter Seals. In Maine, surplus equipment is donated to Costa Rica through the Rotary Club, and computers are donated to families. North Carolina contracts with a private nonprofit organization to operate its Technology Exchange Post equipment listing.
Equipment recycling programs receive, recondition, and store used assistive technology devices for re-use either by selling or donating to persons needing such devices. An associated higher level of services and cost clearly exists with refurbishing assistive technology that might otherwise be discarded, but the increased investment and involvement results in a greater reward, especially for individuals who cannot afford to buy personal devices. Recycling programs offer assistive technology and computers through a website and on-line listing. Computers, wheelchairs and other durable medical equipment are most commonly recycled. Certain restrictions may apply to devices that will be accepted such as the age of the computer or operability of the DME. Computers, in general, must be Internet capable and possess a specified processor. The programs are promoted via web sites, newsletters, brochures, and presentations. Outreach to participants is often coordinated with other agencies to pick up, store, clean or refurbish, and deliver used equipment. Findings 30 states report operating equipment exchange and/or recycling programs (Tables 3, 4, 5, and 6). 9 have an exchange program only, eleven only recycling, and 10 operate both. All projects operate statewide except in Florida, where service is currently dedicated to persons residing in the northwest part of the state. Staff associated with the state projects provide most of the services. The most popular items to exchange or recycle are computers, DME such as wheelchairs, walkers, and beds, and other forms of assistive technology devices. The programs are promoted via web sites, newsletters, brochures, presentations, and other outreach. Range of Services and Associated Fees— In recycling programs a third party is typically involved, which may include pick up and delivery of items, storage, and refurbishing. There is clearly an associated higher cost with equipment recycling, but also a higher level of services and involvement. While most exchange programs do not charge fees, a number of recycling programs have a implemented a fee for services. For example, Florida charges $35 per system and Ohio charges $25 for computer recycling. Some states, such as Georgia and Louisiana, report a delivery or shipping and handling fee. Maine has a $50 annual membership fee. Programs Primarily Funded by General AT Act Dollars— Most of the exchange and recycling programs are funded by general AT Act dollars. However, some states, such as Florida, Georgia, Missouri and Pennsylvania, have designated a few thousand to tens of thousands of dollars for their projects. Kansas received a $200,000 in-kind match by the lead agency. Nebraska received $100,000 from state programs and grants. And in Utah, the state provides funding for personnel space. Quantifying Benefits by Tracking Equipment Value— In Nebraska, TechConnectors provided 80 used computers to vocational rehabilitation clients at an estimated savings of $80,000. A Variety of Innovative Practices— There are several innovative practices among the states. Connecticut uses a business model with its NEAT Marketplace. The Marketplace includes 25,000 square feet of computer lab, displays, accessible meeting and classroom space. Organizations, vendors and evaluators pay fees to use the services, which help sustain the operation. They are looking to make this a regional program to leverage costs among neighboring states. In Georgia, the ReBoot program operates with 85% consumer involvement. Indiana is working toward a statewide clearinghouse for all exchange programs. The Iowa project supports refurbishing by Easter Seals. In Louisiana, recycled computers are delivered to the home. Nebraska’s TechConnectors program offers recycled assistive technology and computers through a web site and on-line listing. In Maine, surplus equipment is donated to Costa Rica through the Rotary Club, and computers are donated to families. North Carolina contracts with a private nonprofit organization to operate its Technology Exchange Post equipment listing.
Credit: This section is indebted to information from the Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive Technology Society of North American (RESNA), especially for their April, 2005, Survey of State AT Act Projects (The RESNA Technical Assistance Project, Grant #H224B020001, funded by the Rehabilitation Services Administration, U.S. Department of Education, under the Assistive Technology Act of 1998). To Top |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||